$$EVAA 24-hour double, trading volume of 310 million, the highest at 0.9868 is like a window paper being pierced, the lowest at 0.4223 is yesterday’s starting line. Is the current 0.8742 a high-level gamble or a deep pullback? My rule: only do what needs to be done, don’t rely on luck.

First, look at the data: 24h low of 0.4223 to high of 0.9868, a fluctuation of 133%, which is a typical feature of stockpile mutual cutting. 0.8742 is neither strong nor weak; if volume increases and stabilizes above 0.90, short-term betting on a push to a new high; if volume shrinks and drops below 0.85, directly avoid and wait for a pullback. My plan is very mechanical:
Entry: place orders at 0.8700-0.8750, aiming for more than 0.95 space, not chasing highs. Stop loss: 0.8450, breaking below signals chip distribution, cannot hold. Take profit: first target 0.9450, second target 0.98, exit upon reaching, no partials. Position: 20% of total funds, avoid heavy positions at high levels.
Here’s an intuition: 0.90 is a key gambling line. If volume breaks through 0.90 and stabilizes before dawn, it indicates bulls are not dead; otherwise, if volume shrinks and hovers between 0.85-0.89, it’s likely a fake move. My operation sheet will follow the price, not predict but respond.
A small tip for those who watch my account regularly: for such highly volatile coins, the night trading volume is more real; watch the 30-minute K-line close. If it drops below 0.86, don’t get itchy to bet on a rebound; the cost of stubbornness is high.
If you agree with this logic, leave a 1 in the comments to tell me if you think 0.90 can hold tomorrow. I will also share the details I captured in the morning in the reply. Remember: no operation outside the plan, doubling and flipping over only a thought away.