$EVAA Did you still chase after a 100% increase in 24 hours? After the third halving, the data from the clone season tells you that 90% of those rushing in now will lose their principal.

I directly hit back with historical hard data. After the 2017 halving, during the altcoin surge cycle, coins that doubled in 24 hours retraced an average of 47% before the second wave.
In 2021, it was even more brutal. For example, a coin like $EVAA that surged from 0.42 to 0.98 in 24 hours, dropped 70% back to the starting point within 5 days.
Currently, $EVAA has a trading volume of 310 million, but the selling pressure in the first half hour has already wiped out 30% of the gains—exactly the same script as before the SHIB peak in May 2021.
Think about it, analyze carefully.
Don't assume operation advice: entering now is equivalent to handing the floor to the whales.
Consider light positions for testing after a pullback to the 0.65-0.7 range, with a stop loss at 0.55 (15% below the previous low).
If it truly breaks above the previous high of 0.9868 and stabilizes for 24 hours, you can chase the rally but keep the position no more than 5% of your total funds.
Take profits in two stages: first target 1.2 (previous high +20%), second target 1.5 (the extreme rebound of similar coins in 2017).
I bet this cycle pattern because after the fourth halving, liquidity is even worse, and project teams only need to outperform the liquidation price of short positions to push the pump.
Last year, before the collapse after a 600% rally of $PEPE, 23% of coins with over 60% daily decline accounted for the total.
Now, $EVAA’s bid-ask spread is just $0.03, and panic buying emotions have already appeared.
History doesn’t repeat simply, but it rhymes.
The rhythm this time is: chasing high causes a 40% retracement, impatiently cutting losses, panic selling pushes the price down to 0.5, then a second wave begins.
Decide for yourself.