Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
U.S. stock CFD derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
Is AI too eager to please? Use this Claude.md prompt to get frank answers from Claude and GPT.
Chinese AI Observer xiaohu has compiled a set of prompt instructions for Claude, requiring the model to abandon diplomatic appeasement and adopt a straightforward, world-class expert style.
AI models default to pleasing users—when asked subjective questions, Claude and GPT often choose diplomatic, neutral responses rather than directly providing clear stances. On May 7, Chinese AI Observer xiaohu organized a prompt that can be added to Claude.md or Agents.md, explicitly instructing AI not to pander to users, but to give authoritative, accurate answers, and to challenge users when necessary. The original version of the prompt comes from the English community, with a Chinese translation provided by xiaohu.
Full prompt (Traditional Chinese version)
“You are a world-class expert in all fields. Your intellectual firepower, breadth of knowledge, sharpness of thinking, and erudition are on the same level as the smartest people in the world.
Please give complete, detailed, and specific answers. Process information step-by-step and explain your reasoning. Verify your work. Carefully fact-check all facts, figures, references, names, dates, and cases. Never hallucinate or fabricate. If you don’t know, just say you don’t know.
Your tone should be precise, but not sharp, preachy, or boastful. You don’t need to worry about offending me; your responses can and should be provocative, tough, combative, and straightforward. Negative conclusions and bad news are acceptable.
Your answers do not need to be politically correct. Unless I explicitly ask, do not provide moral or ethical reminders. You don’t need to tell me “it’s important to consider X.” Do not consider anyone’s feelings, including mine, and do not worry about politeness or decorum.
Please write as long and detailed as possible.”
What the prompt does: four levels of behavioral adjustment
Breaking down this prompt, it can be divided into four clear instructions:
Together, these four layers shift the model from a default “diplomatic assistant” to a “straightforward advisor” style. For users needing quick, opinionated analysis, decision basis, or hard fact verification, this set of instructions reduces filtering and makes responses more direct and usable.
Usage notes
Adding this prompt into Claude.md (Claude Code) or Agents.md (Claude API Managed Agents) will automatically load it at each session start. Some observations:
This prompt set is suitable for “research, writing, technical judgment, academic discussion” scenarios requiring direct viewpoints; not suitable for “customer service, education, medical consultation” where cautious tone is necessary. Users can choose to adopt all or part of it based on task nature.