Recently, "Singapura" has frequently appeared in internal network videos.


Most people find it hard to understand why a country with a Chinese majority would insist on multiculturalism and coexistence.
Actually, this approach is correct; a society definitely needs multiple ethnic groups or nations to build it, and a shared set of values must be formed.
But the question is, does Singapore have the ability to accommodate so many ethnic groups?
In reality, the United States and the United Kingdom have not handled this well.
The US is correcting course, re-establishing white American cohesion.
Other countries have basically failed.
To unite so many different faiths and languages among ethnic groups, a strong dominant ethnicity is definitely needed, not deliberate weakening.
China took thousands of years to assimilate and sinicize different ethnic groups, leading to its current multi-ethnic society.
The Han people are the main and core ethnicity—that's the consensus.
Other societies almost lack this capability.
Moreover, Indians are inherently a difficult ethnicity to assimilate, and most Southeast Asian countries are more deeply influenced by Indian culture; Chinese culture has only reached Vietnam at most.
If Singapore does not firmly establish Chinese ethnic consciousness, it will soon be assimilated by India in the opposite direction, and then it might truly become "Singapura."
Most Chinese people would definitely find it very hard to accept this.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned