#6月3日，美國眾議院以215票對208票通過戰爭權力決議，要求川普停止對伊朗軍事行動，未經國會授權不得繼續作戰。4名共和黨議員與民主黨共同投下贊成票，係2月開戰以來首次。雖決議象徵意��

US Congress Moves to Restrict Military Action Against Iran
On June 3, the United States House of Representatives took a significant step in asserting congressional authority over military operations by passing a War Powers Resolution with a narrow vote of 215–208. The resolution calls for an immediate halt to ongoing U.S. military actions against Iran that were initiated without formal congressional authorization.
The vote marked a rare moment of bipartisan cooperation, with four Republican lawmakers joining Democrats in support of the measure. This cross-party alignment reflects growing concern within Congress about the executive branch’s expanding use of military force without direct legislative approval.
The resolution specifically urges President Donald Trump to cease hostilities against Iran and reinforces the constitutional requirement that any prolonged military engagement must be authorized by Congress. Supporters of the resolution argue that the Constitution clearly assigns the power to declare war to the legislative branch, not the president alone.
Donald Trump has faced increasing scrutiny over his administration’s foreign policy decisions, particularly regarding military engagement in the Middle East. Critics of the administration argue that recent actions risk escalating tensions in an already volatile region without sufficient oversight or strategic clarity.
Meanwhile, members of the United States House of Representatives who supported the resolution emphasized the importance of restoring congressional authority in matters of war and peace. They described the vote as a necessary check on executive power rather than an attempt to limit national defense capabilities.
Despite its passage in the House, the resolution is largely symbolic and does not carry the force of law unless it is also approved by the Senate and signed by the president. However, its passage sends a strong political message and signals growing unease among lawmakers about ongoing military operations.
Opponents of the resolution argued that restricting presidential military authority could weaken the United States’ ability to respond quickly to emerging threats. They also warned that such constraints might embolden adversaries in the region.
This vote is the first major legislative push since the escalation of military activity in February, highlighting a shift in congressional engagement with foreign policy oversight. Analysts suggest that the close vote margin reflects deep divisions within both parties over the balance of power between Congress and the presidency.
As geopolitical tensions continue, the resolution is expected to fuel further debate over the War Powers Act and the constitutional limits of executive military authority. Whether or not it leads to immediate policy changes, it clearly underscores a renewed struggle over who controls U.S. war-making decisions in the 21st century.