Recently looked at a few DAO proposals, superficially written as "for the ecosystem," but when I turn to the incentive page, I start to laugh: who receives subsidies, who has voting rights, who can change the rules, are all mostly hidden in the parameters. To put it plainly, the power structure isn't in the slogans, but in the distribution table. Then in the group chat, people are still arguing whether privacy coins/mixing coins are considered original sins, and how to draw the boundaries of compliance... I just feel even more: if you don't dare to clearly state "who can decide the boundaries," then the voting is actually just a formality. By the way, a flag: I treat complexity as an enemy; only proposals that can be explained in one sentence are worth my confirmation.