These days, I've come across a bunch of DAO voting proposals, superficially about "optimizing parameters/supporting the ecosystem," but basically it's still about who gets to decide and who can earn incentives. I'm most afraid of those who shout about decentralization but write the voting thresholds and proxy rules very meticulously, ending up with a few big players exchanging glances. My small votes are just like firecrackers. I conveniently saved screenshots of the key parts... for future reference when reviewing old issues.

Additionally, before and after upgrades/maintenance on mainstream public chains, everyone in the group is guessing whether projects will migrate. I think it's more of an opportunistic move: as soon as a proposal appears, someone immediately offers "migration subsidies/liquidity rewards," and the power structure gets a quick wash. They complain on the surface, but in practice, they still calculate the cost of boosting scores—just don’t burn yourself out.