Recently, people keep asking whether "on-chain privacy" can really serve as an invisibility cloak... I think the average person's expectations are a bit too high. On-chain activities are inherently traceable; no matter how much effort you put in, you're just increasing the cost of association, not making yourself completely disappear. Not to mention that once you involve fiat currency deposits and withdrawals, exchanges, or even certain front-end interfaces, compliance measures will pull you back to reality: you can have some privacy, but don’t expect to play hide-and-seek with regulators.

These days, AI agent automated trading is being hyped up as very mysterious, feeling like half the people are talking about the future, and the other half are secretly taking security lessons. To put it simply, before handing over the keys to "automation," think carefully: who can access your wallet, and who do you turn to if something goes wrong? My approach is a bit old-fashioned: separate addresses, minimize permissions, keep limits small, and don’t get too aggressive with positions—just start with that.