Recently, I’ve been looking at the play-to-earn model in blockchain games—basically, it’s just issuing tokens nonstop and calling it wages. The moment output ramps up, inflation first squashes the token price; the players’ earnings still come from the same pool of money. Then, once fewer new people join and the pool can’t cover withdrawals, everyone starts competing to sell. In the end, it’s not the game that dies—it’s the economy that first collapses. What’s even more ridiculous is that some people watch large transfers on-chain and watch for unusual movements across exchange hot/cold wallets, treating them as “smart money.” But what I’m seeing more often looks like the project team rebalancing their positions, setting up liquidity/market depth, and arranging their exit timing… Either way, don’t mistake moving funds for a signal. First, revoke those inexplicable authorizations—so you don’t wake up one day to find yet another “cost of learning.”

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned