Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
U.S. stock CFD derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
Lately there's been a debate about whether NFT royalties should be mandatory or not. As I scroll through, I start to get a bit distracted... To put it simply, the secondary market wants liquidity; everyone wants to "buy low and sell high." Creators also want a long-term income stream, not just selling out at launch and then running out of funds. Neither side is wrong, but when put together, it’s easy for them to dislike each other.
My current feeling is: mandatory royalties seem to be using rules to compensate for "trust," but once the market rejects it, liquidity disappears, and the work becomes harder to be seen; completely removing royalties can easily turn into "just supporting flippers." A more realistic approach might be to make royalties more like a service fee: only charge those who provide ongoing value (updates, rights, community), and feel justified doing so. Otherwise, don’t force it.
Anyway, I don’t really take sides on which new chain or platform will win; in the end, it still depends on where people are actually using and consuming content. Next time I see a beautiful scene on the road, I’ll also check what’s happening with the chain’s debates… That’s all for now.