Last night, the group was again sharing screenshots of "a certain stablecoin losing its peg."

I was feeling anxious while browsing the project's GitHub and audit reports.
As I kept scrolling, I realized I almost made a foolish mistake: only feeling secure because there's "audit/open source."
What scared me even more was that the update logs clearly showed a significant upgrade, but I didn't check how many people had multi-signature access, whether there was a delay, or if the permissions could be collectively replaced—I completely didn't click in to look...
I almost just assumed "it's safe anyway" and left it as is.

Now, my trustworthiness assessment is quite basic:
Check GitHub commits to see if they are continuous and if the same group of people have been fixing bugs long-term;
Don't look at the cover logo of the audit report first, but find "unresolved/known risks";
Then check how many keys are involved in the multi-signature upgrade and whether there's a timelock.
Honestly, regulation can tell me what to do, but permissions and retention at least help me avoid being driven by emotions.
I may sound pessimistic, but in practice, I still choose to add a little caution—just like that for now.