Lately, when checking if a project is truly working, I actually focus on government treasury expenditures: where the money is spent, who signed off, and whether the milestones match up. I'm most afraid of those phrases like "promoting ecological cooperation/market expansion this month," flipping the wallet address, and seeing it's all for consultants, BD, and various "growth" services, but the output is just a PowerPoint; on the other hand, some teams argue fiercely in meetings, but each outsourced task, audit, or development incentive can be linked to a verifiable deliverable, even if delayed, they will explain clearly, and they will refund the unused budget. I am willing to be patient with those. Now everyone is arguing over whether to reverse or continue squeezing the bubble regarding extreme fund fee rates; I think it's the same logic: watching who is using money and actions to oppose emotions, otherwise it's just storytelling and tug-of-war—alright, I'll shut up now.