I’m not very good at that skill of instantly seeing through whether a project is legit or not, but after looking for a while, I think new users can only tell “credibility” in three ways: don’t just look at GitHub stars—go check whether people are truly still committing recently, and whether issues are being answered; don’t blindly trust the logos in audit reports—focus on whether the write-up clearly spells out high-risk points, and whether the project team later went back and addressed them; upgrading multi-signature is even more important—plainly put, it’s about “who can change the rules with one click”—whether the number of signers is sufficiently distributed, and whether there’s a timelock so everyone has time to react. Lately, during the airdrop season, the points and task platforms have turned into something like workplace check-in, and what I care about more is whether these underlying systems can suddenly turn face. If, after some casual use, I get cut off by an upgrade that applies a one-size-fits-all rule—that’s the real blank paperwork. For now, that’s it—I’ll keep waiting and looking for cheaper-fee neighborhoods.