I look at the project "trustworthy or not" and actually don't pay much attention to what it claims about AI Agents or smart automatic trading. Instead, I check GitHub and audits first. GitHub isn't about the number of stars; it's about whether there has been continuous activity in recent months and what has been changed: if the core contracts are frequently modified but the testing/rollback plans are empty, I get a bit worried. When it comes to audit reports, don't just look at "passed"; I skim for high-risk issues to see if they've been genuinely fixed or if they've just said "risk accepted" and moved on.

Upgrading multi-signature setups is more practical: you may not be able to see all signers, but at least check the threshold, whether there's a timelock, and if upgrade permissions are separated from fund permissions. Honestly, what I fear most isn't losing money but losing control—money is still there, but the rules suddenly change, and you can't react in time. Recently, with the rise of automated interaction narratives, I pay even more attention to these details. That's all for now.