Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
U.S. stock CFD derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
Recently, I saw a bunch of people talking about LST and re-staking again, and honestly, the returns are not just falling from the sky: some are basic interest from validation/staking, while more are like a "reselling the same security again" premium. When market sentiment is good, people are willing to pay; when sentiment drops, there's run risk, discounts, on-chain unbinding queues, all happening together.
Don't just focus on the risks of contract liquidation. LST itself has price anchoring, liquidity, and redemption times; re-staking adds layers like protocol/node/penalty rules, contract vulnerabilities, governance parameter changes—these are the "slow knives." The extra yield you get might be a subsidy for bearing tail risks.
By the way, hardware wallets are sold out now, phishing links are everywhere, and everyone's security awareness has suddenly increased... but the most common on-chain death is still just quick authorization. Anyway, I can tolerate the funding rates and liquidation hot zones, but I really can't stand seeing a bunch of unlimited authorizations. It's more practical to tighten permissions first than to study yield curves.