Zama Founder: Currently communicating with all parties to expedite the unfreezing of the cUSDC contract, and a detailed post-event analysis will be released.

robot
Abstract generation in progress
ME News Report, May 30 (UTC+8), Zama Protocol founder Rand issued a latest statement regarding the freezing of the cUSDC contract. The root cause has been identified; the incident is completely unrelated to Zama itself or privacy technology, and stems from the Overnight Finance hacker address previously depositing about $12.5 million USDC. At that time, the address was not flagged on sanctions lists nor intercepted by KYT tools. But last night, a restraining order was issued by a U.S. court to freeze the hacker-related wallet. Since over 99% of the funds within the contract came from that hacker, the court directly demanded the entire wrapper contract be frozen to lock the illicit funds. Zama emphasized that it has always adhered to a "compliance and confidentiality" stance and does not tolerate any illegal activities. The team is currently communicating with all parties to expedite unfreezing, and has temporarily suspended the cUSDC, cUSDT, and cWETH contracts for thorough investigation. A detailed post-incident analysis and future plans for handling similar court orders will be released later. (Source: BlockBeats)
ZAMA-1.61%
USDC0.01%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
OracleBabysitter
· 14h ago
99% of the funds in the wrapping contract come from hackers, this ratio is just too outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-6bc62511
· 15h ago
This case has been included in textbooks: How privacy protocols prevent dirty money from flowing in
View OriginalReply0
SudoSoul
· 16h ago
Maintaining consistent confidentiality and compliance is the key point; subsequent communication speed is very important.
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfCoffee
· 16h ago
How could Overnight Finance's hacker deposit such a large amount? What about risk control?
View OriginalReply0
0xCouchPilot
· 16h ago
Wait for a detailed analysis to see how to block this vulnerability on a technical level.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-656cc6e4
· 16h ago
The court directly freezes contracts, and the boundaries of DeFi compliance are becoming increasingly blurred.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityBarista
· 16h ago
The compliance team acted quickly; pausing the investigation is a responsible approach.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-23bf1070
· 16h ago
cUSDC cUSDT cWETH are all halted, user liquidity is significantly affected.
View OriginalReply0
MistValleySignpost
· 16h ago
$12.5 million in hacker funds have been laundered in, and Zama won't take the blame for this.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pinned