I look at whether the project team is seriously working, rather than just focusing on slogans. First, see how the national treasury funds are spent: whether payments are made in stages according to milestones, whether the people doing the work are receiving salaries rather than "rewards," and whether large expenditures can clearly explain who they are for or what they bring. To put it simply, the more the money is spent like a normal company’s (traceable, reviewable, without so many mysterious transfers), the more willing I am to hold on for a longer time.

Recently, the group has been discussing stablecoin regulation, reserve audits, and various rumors about "de-pegging," and when emotions run high, it’s easy to make reckless moves. I now remind myself: don’t follow the panic, first compare on-chain expenses with deliveries. It’s okay if you don’t understand my slow pace; I don’t need to be understood. Anyway, my rhythm is to survive longer first.