Buy Crypto
Pay with
USD
USD
Buy & Sell
Hot
Supports Visa, Mastercard, SEPA & more
P2P
0 Fees
Flexible trading, zero fees
Gate Card
Use your crypto for payments worldwide
Markets
Trade
Basic
Advanced
Futures
Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
U.S. Stocks
CFD
U.S. stock CFD derivatives
Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
GUSD
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Earn
Launch
CandyDrop
tag
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Investment
Square
Square
Post, share, and explore crypto trends
Live
moments live
Live crypto market analysis
Chat
Chat with crypto traders
News
What is happening in crypto
flower_head
More
Promotions
AI
Others
TradFi
Gate Card
Rewards
Square
Latest
Hot
News
Profile

Epoch AI releases Claude's specialization map: coding strengths have always been there, Opus 4.6 and 4.7 have filled in the mathematical gaps

MeNews
robot
Abstract generation in progress
AIMPACT News, May 16 (UTC+8): According to Dongcha’s Beating monitoring, Epoch AI has released the latest analysis of its Domain-specific ECI (Domain-specific Capability Index), revealing that the Claude series models under Anthropic have historically been strong in coding while weak in mathematics relative to their overall capabilities. However, the latest data shows that this imbalance is being rapidly addressed. Based on calculations, across previous generations of models, Claude’s performance on the Software Engineering Benchmark (SWE-ECI) has consistently been higher than its overall score, while a long-standing gap has persisted on the Math Benchmark (Math-ECI). The newly released Opus 4.6 and 4.7 models have narrowed the difference between math and overall scores to within 1 point, filling the prior shortcoming. The ECI measurement mechanism compares the relative performance of major models, thereby directly reflecting the average difficulty of specific tasks for AI, rather than the difficulty for humans. (Source: BlockBeats)
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • 1
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
Half-SectionedSucculent
· 1h ago
The relative difficulty index is more interesting than the absolute score; it reflects the actual gap narrowing between models.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-c3de680b
· 2h ago
Opus 4.6/4.7—This round of strengthening weak points is very solid; the code is strong, and the math is catching up too. Only then can it truly be a genuine first-tier option in terms of versatility.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-5578154d
· 3h ago
Claude finally got serious about math.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeHopster
· 3h ago
A difference within one minute, rounded to the nearest whole, means no shortcomings.
View OriginalReply0
SudoSage
· 3h ago
SWE and Math are both high-level, this generation's Opus can be called an all-rounder.
View OriginalReply0

  • Pinned

Sitemap