ZachXBT states that the issue of stablecoin issuers freezing funds in real-time should not be conflated with DeFi security.

robot
Abstract generation in progress
ME News Report, April 18 (UTC+8), in response to Neeraj K. Agrawal's statement that "asking Circle to act as the police of the crypto world does not enhance DeFi security," on-chain investigator ZachXBT responded that it is inaccurate to conflate "whether stablecoin issuers should freeze assets in real-time" with "DeFi security," because publicly traded companies and centralized stablecoin issuers are not part of DeFi. ZachXBT stated that in a "clear and definite" case, approximately $230 million in illegal funds were laundered within six hours; if the related infrastructure and customer compliance are inadequate, this is a very poor example. He also criticized the inefficiency of using legal procedures to pressure victims instead of establishing real-time response mechanisms, and said that Circle should not selectively switch between "centralized" and "decentralized" based on its own interests. (Source: MLion)
CRCLX-1.77%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 1
  • 2
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
CapitalFlowInATeacup
· 8h ago
ZachXBT's response was on point. Indeed, conflating DeFi and CeFi is a misrepresentation of the concepts.
View OriginalReply0