Iranian public: U.S. words and actions are untrustworthy, must remain highly vigilant

robot
Abstract generation in progress
ME News Report, May 27 (UTC+8), regarding the U.S. strikes on southern Iran, Iranian citizens expressed that the U.S. words and actions are not trustworthy and doubted whether the U.S. and Iran can reach an agreement. Some Iranian citizens stated: "The Iran nuclear deal is just an example; the U.S. has betrayed everything. The recent firing is the same. The U.S.'s contradictory statements clearly show that their words are not guaranteed. But I think the war won't continue because the U.S. has paid a high price and is very afraid. We control the Strait of Hormuz, which might be worse for the U.S. than having a hundred nuclear bombs. We are very familiar with those U.S. statements; they are all untrustworthy, and we must be highly vigilant. People need to be careful because similar incidents like the U.S. withdrawing from the Iran nuclear deal could happen again. In other words, the U.S.-Iran agreement might be torn apart." (Source: ODAILY)
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
OffshoreWindOrder
· 4h ago
Betrayal once leads to a second time; the Iranian people are not fools.
View OriginalReply0
NeonIceMelt
· 4h ago
Only afraid of paying the price, why didn't I do it earlier?
View OriginalReply0
ContractsMustNotLie.
· 4h ago
This storyline was performed once in 2018; it's just a rerun.
View OriginalReply0
EvenRocksNeedLiquidity
· 4h ago
Control of the Strait is the trump card; if played, the U.S. can't handle it.
View OriginalReply0
NodeUnderTheAurora
· 4h ago
Once trust collapses, rebuilding it is harder than climbing to the sky.
View OriginalReply0
ToBeHonest,You'llLose
· 4h ago
The U.S. side's statement is self-contradictory, a classic case of wanting everything and not giving anything.
View OriginalReply0
OwlAuthorizationMonitor
· 4h ago
Suspecting is correct; history does not lie.
View OriginalReply0