BMNR holds 5,390,404 ETH, with a total crypto and cash holdings reaching $12.3 billion.

robot
Abstract generation in progress
Mars Finance News: According to an official announcement from BitMine Immersion Technologies, as of May 25, 2026, BMNR holds 5,390,404 ETH (average cost of $2,134), accounting for 4.47% of the total ETH supply. The progress toward its “5% alchemy” target is 89%. The company’s total cryptocurrency assets, cash, and “Moon Shot” positions total $12.3 billion, including $444 million in cash. For staking, BMNR has staked 4.71 million ETH (about $10.1 billion), and is expected to generate an annualized staking return of $276 million (a 7-day annualized yield of 2.75%).
ETH-1.61%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
QuantumLittleTomato
· 2h ago
10.1 billion in pledges plus 444 million in cash—liquidity management is very Web2
View OriginalReply0
DustCollector
· 2h ago
276 million annualized staking rewards, just lying back and collecting rent.
View OriginalReply0
SugarAirdropDream
· 2h ago
7-day annualized rate of 2.75%, slightly below the overall, has staking yields been decreasing recently?
View OriginalReply0
BudgetDeFi
· 2h ago
5% Alchemy goal, 89% progress, feels like it can be achieved by Q3?
View OriginalReply0
PleaseReadTheWhitepaperFirst.
· 2h ago
An annualized return of 276 million should be more than enough to cover operating costs.
View OriginalReply0
BribeCoffee
· 2h ago
Still 0.53% short of 5%. At the current price, approximately how much more ETH needs to be bought?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-1859b7cd
· 2h ago
BMNR is treating ETH as a bond allocation.
View OriginalReply0
ExitLiquidityIntern
· 2h ago
This data transparency is good, much better than some institutions.
View OriginalReply0