Federal Reserve Board member Waller is cautious about interest rate cuts, warning of long-term conflict risks

robot
Abstract generation in progress
ME News Report, April 18 (UTC+8), Federal Reserve Board Member Waller stated that due to the energy shock triggered by the Iran war, he remains cautious about whether a rate cut is needed in the short term and warned that the conflict could have a lasting impact on inflation. Waller outlined two main scenarios in his speech. In the first scenario, if the Strait of Hormuz reopens and trade flows return to normal, officials will be able to ignore the surge in energy prices and shift their focus later this year to a weakening labor market. He said, "If this occurs, I see a prospect where inflation continues to fall toward the 2% target, which would make me cautious about current rate cuts and more inclined to support the labor market through rate cuts later this year when the outlook is more stable." However, he warned that oil prices and the overall market are underestimating the risk of prolonged conflict. "In terms of inflation, the risk is that the longer the conflict persists and energy prices stay high, the greater the likelihood that these high prices will permeate other prices, as businesses will incorporate the high energy input costs into their pricing." He stated that if this happens against a backdrop of a weak labor market, it would limit policy response space. In such a scenario, he would weigh the risks of higher inflation against a weaker labor market, "If the inflation risk exceeds the labor market risk, it could mean maintaining the policy rate within the current target range." (Source: Jintou)
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • 2
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
TheTreeInTheCenterOfMistValley
· 4h ago
I'd rather have high interest rates than relive the stagflation of the 1970s.
View OriginalReply0
ReviewMonsterDoesn'tSleep
· 4h ago
If the strait reopens quickly, there will still be a chance in the second half of the year
View OriginalReply0
YieldYuki
· 4h ago
The market is once again re-pricing expectations of interest rate cuts.
View OriginalReply0
StainedGlassSolarArray
· 4h ago
Waller's statement is quite straightforward; both sides are stuck.
View OriginalReply0
GoldfishUnderTheIce
· 4h ago
Will interest rates be lowered later this year—how much later is "later"?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-af0ea0c9
· 4h ago
High inflation and weak employment—this trade-off just sounds headache-inducing.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-9187acf1
· 4h ago
Waller is probably hawkish; this statement is not surprising.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropCheatSheet
· 4h ago
There are really no good options when oil prices and employment are both taking a hit.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-9d67589f
· 4h ago
If the conflict escalates, the policy space will indeed be limited.
View OriginalReply0
Semi-MeltedIceCream
· 4h ago
The 2% inflation target now seems like an unreachable pie.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pinned