Federal Reserve Board member Waller is cautious about interest rate cuts, warning of long-term conflict risks

robot
Abstract generation in progress
ME News Report, April 18 (UTC+8), Federal Reserve Board Member Waller stated that due to the energy shock triggered by the Iran war, he remains cautious about whether a rate cut is needed in the short term and warned that the conflict could have a sustained impact on inflation. Waller outlined two main scenarios in his speech. In the first scenario, if the Strait of Hormuz reopens and trade flows return to normal, officials will be able to ignore the surge in energy prices and shift their focus later this year to a weakening labor market. He said, "If this occurs, I think there is a prospect that inflation could continue to fall toward the 2% target, which would make me cautious about current rate cuts and more inclined to support the labor market through rate cuts later this year when the outlook is more stable." However, he warned that oil prices and the overall market are underestimating the risk of the conflict becoming prolonged. "In terms of inflation, the risk is that the longer the conflict persists and energy prices stay high, the greater the likelihood that these elevated prices will permeate into other prices, as businesses will incorporate high energy costs into their pricing." He stated that if this happens against a backdrop of a weak labor market, it would limit policy response space. In such a scenario, he would weigh the risks of higher inflation against a weaker labor market, "If the inflation risk exceeds the labor market risk, it could mean maintaining the policy rate within the current target range." (Source: Jintou)
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 12
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
GlassCityAfterTheRain
· 7h ago
2% target vs employment, a classic dilemma
View OriginalReply0
RiskParityKid
· 11h ago
The Federal Reserve's toolbox appears thin in the face of geopolitics.
View OriginalReply0
OffshoreWindOrder
· 13h ago
Wait until policies are clearer before deciding on the direction.
View OriginalReply0
TransparentGlassFeather
· 13h ago
The labor market has now become a secondary contradiction.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-2bbf8435
· 13h ago
If the Strait of Hormuz is truly sealed for a long time, the Federal Reserve will suffer on both ends.
View OriginalReply0
LendingPoolObserver
· 13h ago
The window for interest rate cuts is getting narrower this year.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-46033407
· 13h ago
Energy shocks + inflation stickiness, stagflation shadow returns again
View OriginalReply0
DustyAirdropper
· 13h ago
If the Taiwan Strait remains closed, a rate cut in September is basically unlikely
View OriginalReply0
YieldBonsai
· 13h ago
Basically, there are two scenarios: just taking things as they come.
View OriginalReply0
SushiRebalance
· 13h ago
Waller's cautious stance is very typical, first observing and waiting.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pinned