Recently, everyone has been hyping that AI Agents on the blockchain can be fully automated, but I still have some reservations. If it really has to handle signing, chain switching, and rebalancing, a single mistake could be irreversible, and ultimately humans still need to step in to cover the bottom line: who sets permission boundaries, who reviews the whitelist, who presses the emergency pause, how to pursue responsibility or compensation for losses—these are not things that can be eliminated just because the "model is smarter." On the macro side, they’re also discussing expectations of interest rate cuts, the US dollar index, and risk assets rising and falling together; I’m even less willing to entrust risk control to a simple "trust the algorithm." Voting in the DAO is the same—while the process can be automated, responsibility should not be automated. Being cautious is never wrong.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned