Today, I encountered that kind of "coincidental transfer" again in the ledger: A just received money and then transferred it to B, B then split it into several transactions into C, looking like a performance... But when you break down the timestamps and amount fragments, it's actually common: multi-signature consolidation, market making replenishment, or automatic deposits and withdrawals on cross-chain bridges. Once the path is traced, it all makes sense. Recently, there's been a debate in the group about privacy coins/mixing coins and compliance boundaries. I can also understand both sides' anxieties. To be honest, sometimes it's not "covering up," but the process is made opaque by tools. What I don't regret is explaining the path clearly before drawing conclusions. Anyway, get the matter done first—don't mistakenly accuse good people or let bad actors go.