Do you ever get the feeling that DAO voting sometimes looks like "everyone deciding together," but when you open the proposal and look closely, it’s more like arranging seats... On the surface, it’s about giving the community treats, but in reality, the incentives are packed into the hands of certain roles: who can write proposals, who can modify parameters, whose delegated votes pass with just a flip—truth be told, the power structure is all written into the terms. Recently, after the cross-chain bridge was hacked again, many people talk about decentralization, but in practice, they collectively "wait for confirmation"—waiting for audits, multi-signatures, or a few people’s approval. Anyway, I now look at voting not for slogans, but to see where the money flows, who can veto with a single vote, so I don’t end up realizing I was just contributing noise in the end.