Recently, I've seen people focus on on-chain large transfers and unusual activity in exchange hot and cold wallets, saying things like "smart money is coming/going"... I'm actually more concerned about whether the safety of these funds' transfer bridges is secure. Cross-chain bridges, to put it simply, are about embedding "trust in whom" into the code: whose multi-signature controls it, how many keys can operate it, and who determines the data fed by the oracle. The easiest thing to overlook is the "waiting for confirmation" step—not nagging, but giving you time for the on-chain status to truly stabilize, rather than still rolling back while releasing assets on the other chain. Anyway, I don't get excited about the promotional hype of bridges right now; I first look at the multi-signature members, upgrade permissions, and whether the bridge can be halted in case of issues... I really don't dare to touch those that run on love and energy alone.