Bloomberg: Prediction markets still have the potential to become more useful, but blurred boundaries could turn them into gambling tools

robot
Abstract generation in progress
ME News message. On May 15 (UTC+8), Bloomberg reported that prediction markets, as a market-based forecasting tool, have long been viewed as an experimental financial instrument that could improve forecasting accuracy, but their development still faces key structural issues. The article reviews that as early as 2008, 22 economists, including Kenneth Arrow, Paul Milgrom, Thomas Schelling, Robert Shiller, and Vernon Smith, published a statement in the journal Science, arguing that prediction markets are a “powerful research tool” and calling for reducing unnecessary regulatory restrictions. These scholars believed at the time that a prediction mechanism based on market price formation could, in some scenarios, be more accurate than traditional expert forecasts or statistical models. However, Authers pointed out that today’s prediction markets still lack clear institutional boundaries, and if the regulatory framework is not clearly defined, their function could gradually shift from an “information discovery tool” to a “gambling product.” Prediction markets are still in an “unformed experimental stage,” and their future direction will depend on how regulators define the boundary between their information-tool attributes and their gambling attributes. (Source: BlockBeats)
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
PaperfoldDao
· 5h ago
If Schelling were alive, he would probably have to rewrite that paper.
View OriginalReply0
GaslightPoet
· 5h ago
There are quite a few Web3 projects involved in prediction markets, but compliance is basically running naked.
View OriginalReply0
ThereAreCatsInTheContract.
· 5h ago
Is Vernon Smith's experimental economics framework still applicable to on-chain markets?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-4eae4cef
· 5h ago
Academic ideals often clash with practical interests, with the latter usually prevailing.
View OriginalReply0
YieldNotYell
· 6h ago
Instead of arguing whether it's gambling or not, why not build a sandbox and give it a try?
View OriginalReply0
MoonlightMineralWater
· 6h ago
Information value vs. speculative pleasure, users can't tell the difference at all
View OriginalReply0
BlocktimeBarista
· 6h ago
High prediction accuracy does not mean high social value; these two should be evaluated separately.
View OriginalReply0
ReflectiveChainShadow
· 6h ago
The longer the regulatory vacuum period, the easier it is for the market to be manipulated.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichAlertAgent
· 6h ago
From research tools to gambling products, this downward risk has been underestimated
View OriginalReply0
FeeTaker
· 6h ago
If structural issues are not addressed, even the most accurate predictions are useless
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pinned