Signal hints at possibly exiting Canada due to the "Legal Access Act"

robot
Abstract generation in progress
ME News Report, May 15 (UTC+8), privacy messaging app Signal stated that if it is forced to comply with Canada's proposed C-22 Act ("Legal Access Act"), it may withdraw from the Canadian market. The bill requires electronic service providers to establish technical monitoring capabilities and retain some user metadata for up to one year to assist law enforcement investigations into crimes such as terrorism and child exploitation. Signal's Vice President of Strategy and Global Affairs Udbhav Tiwari said that the bill could threaten end-to-end encryption, making private communication services vulnerable to cyberattacks, and the company "would rather exit Canada" than compromise on user privacy commitments. VPN provider Windscribe also stated that if C-22 passes, they will likely follow suit and exit, as VPNs almost certainly need to log user identity data. The bill has not yet become law and still requires approval from Parliament and royal assent. (Source: PANews)
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 2
  • 2
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
LonelyStoneUnderTheAurora
· 8h ago
The balance between privacy and security is a well-worn topic, but forcing the retention of metadata clearly leans too heavily toward compromising privacy.
View OriginalReply0
NeonVortexInTheSmog
· 8h ago
Can the parliamentary review be delayed a bit, giving the tech community some time to lobby?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pinned