ChatGPT is accused of leaking question clues, and Meta and Google are also involved

robot
Abstract generation in progress
ME News Report, May 15 (UTC+8), according to Beating Monitoring, California user Amargo Couture filed a class action lawsuit against OpenAI Global, LLC, accusing ChatGPT.com of transmitting question topics and identity recognition information to Meta and Google via Meta Pixel and Google Analytics after users input questions. The complaint states that these transmissions occurred without user knowledge or consent, allegedly violating the ECPA, CIPA, and California privacy laws. The core focus of the plaintiff is on webpage tracking codes. What users ask, how the page title changes, and whether Meta and Google can match cookies to real accounts have become the main disputes in this lawsuit. The complaint cites an example where, after a user inputs "Who won the 2005 Super Bowl" in ChatGPT, the page title changes to "Super Bowl 2005 Winner," which is then sent along with tracking requests from Meta Pixel and Google Analytics. The complaint further states that Meta may receive the page title and Facebook recognition cookies, while Google may receive the page title, hashed email, and account-related cookies. The plaintiff believes this information is sufficient for third parties to link ChatGPT query topics with specific users. The case is still in the filing stage; the claims are allegations by the plaintiff, and the court has not yet made a factual determination. (Source: BlockBeats)
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • 2
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
NightTideShell
· 7h ago
If this move by OpenAI is true, user privacy has really become a joke.
View OriginalReply0
PerpNightRunner
· 7h ago
If this is confirmed, other AI products will also need to conduct self-inspections.
View OriginalReply0
RugCheckSkeptic
· 7h ago
The court's ruling remains cautious, but the stock price may have moved first.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-52241ed6
· 7h ago
Lack of consent is a serious flaw, a compliance loophole under GDPR thinking
View OriginalReply0
HeavyStakingOnASnowyNight
· 7h ago
California privacy laws have become increasingly active in recent years.
View OriginalReply0
Stop-LossInTheEveningGlow
· 7h ago
Waiting for OpenAI's response statement, how to make it sound smooth
View OriginalReply0
FlamingoFrontView
· 7h ago
The technical details are written quite thoroughly, and the quality of the complaint is online.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pinned