Recently, there has been controversy over the secondary market lowering royalties, essentially everyone just wants to buy and sell more cheaply, but creators are also genuinely uncomfortable. What I care more about is: are royalties considered "protocol-level rules" or "market-accepted etiquette"? If it's just etiquette, then when the market is bad, they will be abandoned, which is quite realistic.

And now many on-chain data tools and tagging systems are also criticized for being laggy or easily manipulated to influence sentiment. You see a certain address and think "the creator is dumping," but it might actually be a studio doing aggregation. When the information is skewed, emotions flare up first. Anyway, after seeing this kind of misjudgment for the third time, I’ve learned my lesson: first check how the contract is written and how the trading path is laid out, then judge morally... for now, that’s how I do it.