I like niche chains and niche tools, and occasionally write tutorials. I don't have much faith, it's mostly curiosity: why does this design actually work?

108

Following

Followers

Liked

PlanB_Follower 2026-10-15

If the buy zone holds, a move toward 0.05 isn’t impossible; just set the stop-loss at 0.042

Gerry_2026-10-15 20:09:06

$LAB is trading around $0.04414 after a minor pullback.
🟢 Buy Zone: $0.04350 – $0.04450
🎯 TP1: $0.04600
🎯 TP2: $0.04800
🎯 TP3: $0.05000
🛑 SL: $0.04200
🔥 If buyers defend the entry range, a recovery toward higher levels could develop.

PlanB_Follower 2026-10-07

After setting a per-transaction slippage cap, I can sleep a little better. Before, whenever I saw an opportunity on-chain, I’d get carried away and jump in. Now I ask myself first: Is the price difference enough to justify the risk of being sandwiched?
Lately I keep seeing people say that transaction ordering is unfair, and that validators earn more than users. Honestly, someone like me—a small retail trader—was never their target in the first place, but it’s still annoying when the price is clearly right and my transaction gets inserted ahead of. Put simply, MEV may be transparent on-chain, b

PlanB_Follower 2026-10-07

I’ve come across several posts equating ETF net inflows with coin price gains and losses, as if the price were a light that turns on when you press a remote button. It sounds neat, but neat things make me a little wary.
Just now, I watched some small-cap coin jump 8% in fifteen minutes, and my finger was already hovering over the buy button. I paused and asked myself: Did I know anything new eight minutes ago? Apparently not—I just saw the candlesticks turn green, and the group chat started parroting “breakout.” So it was emotion pushing me, not information.
That’s enough for now. I’m leaving

PlanB_Follower 2026-09-20

Holding around $12 is an opportunity; first, let’s see whether it can reclaim $12.30.

Jens2026-09-20 11:15:50

$LINK has pulled back toward $12.
The $11.80–$12.00 region is the area I’m watching for buyer reaction. If it holds and $12.30 gets reclaimed, a relief move could develop.
Bullish 🟢 above support.
#LINK #Chainlink

PlanB_Follower 2026-09-05

When my eyes get so sore I can barely keep them open, I go wash my face. When I came back and took another look at an RWA pool on some obscure chain, the liquidity was impressively deep—but actually redeeming requires waiting for “valuation confirmation,” and that step could drag on for half a day. Put bluntly, the depth you see is an illusion created by other people’s orders; it’s not a door you can walk through whenever you want.
Another bridge blew up these past two days, and after the oracle errored out, everyone said they were waiting for confirmation—but really, they were all waiting for

RWA+0.79%

PlanB_Follower 2026-09-05

I bridged across chains this morning, and the gas warning on mainnet still made me pause. I had moved funds into some obscure rollup to save a few bucks, only to find that when I wanted to move them back to mainnet for a transaction, the fee instantly wiped out the point of my small trade. Sometimes it’s hard to understand: the options outside are happily saving you money, but every time you think of “going back to mainnet,” you can’t help mentally equating it to the cost of two or three cups of coffee.
It’s not that L2s are bad, but you have to accept that they’re different species. After thi

RWA+0.79%

PlanB_Follower 2026-08-31

The structure of this CRV move is indeed clean. If it retests around 0.31 and confirms support, you could consider taking a position, but don’t FOMO-chase the price higher.

Original content no longer visible

CRV+2.83%

PlanB_Follower 2026-08-16

The debate over secondary-market royalties is back in the headlines today. I don’t really have strong feelings about it—I’m just genuinely curious. I’ve previously looked into a few tools on obscure chains and found the execution logic behind mandatory royalty collection to be rather disjointed. Market makers were scared off immediately, and liquidity dried up almost instantly. But if you say they should be ignored entirely, independent creators really would lose a substantial chunk of income, which also feels like a shame.
While scrolling through the news, I happened to see that people are on

RWA+0.79%

PlanB_Follower 2026-07-31

Just went through the voting pages of several DAOs and found something pretty interesting. Some proposals look like community governance on the surface, but the incentives and power structure are actually hidden in the parameters—for example, setting the voting threshold particularly high, or making the time window so tight that most people haven’t even reacted before it ends. To put it plainly, real decision-making power is still concentrated in the hands of a small number of large holders.
Lately I keep seeing big transfers interpreted as “smart money,” but a lot of on-chain activity behind

PlanB_Follower 2026-07-31

I flipped through a few previously followed obscure NFTs, and the floor price has dropped again by a noticeable chunk. The royalty dispute has been going back and forth for months; now it looks like liquidity has increased a bit, but once the community’s momentum fades, it just fades. Sometimes I really think NFTs are like this: when they’re hot, it’s like throwing a party, and when they’re cold, there isn’t even anyone around to clean up the place.
Anyway, I’m slow on the uptake—so slow that by the time a wave of FOMO passes, I’m still waiting for the team to tell the story in a fully formed

PlanB_Follower 2026-07-17

I reread the scoring rules of a few task platforms again, and the more I look, the more it feels like this isn’t “sweeping for free rewards”—it’s work. Daily check-ins, doing tasks, accumulating points, and also having to guard against being flagged as a sybil—there are all kinds of behavioral pattern analyses, on-chain interaction depth, and time-distribution weighting. It really does look like performance scoring. I’m honestly quite curious what this kind of “decentralized” scoring system will ultimately evolve into; it might end up being more complex than many L1s themselves.
Recently, I’ve

PlanB_Follower 2026-07-08

$88 test transfer, is SpaceX about to make a big move or just test the waters? 👀

Original content no longer visible

SPCX-0.60%

SPCXG-0.46%

SPCXX-0.56%

PlanB_Follower 2026-07-07

90% drop, this candlestick chart looks cleaner than my wallet.

Original content no longer visible

PlanB_Follower 2026-07-07

Summer fi, this operation has me laughing—can a disabled strategy still be included in NAV? Did the auditor fall asleep?

WuSaidBlockchainW2026-07-07 17:05:22

Summer fi: The Lazy Summer attack is not a contract vulnerability, but rather an exploitation of the NAV mechanism.

Wu said he learned that Summer fi released a post-mortem report on the Lazy Summer Protocol USDC vault attack, stating that on July 6, the attacker exploited a flaw in the net asset value (NAV) calculation mechanism of two Ethereum USDC vaults. In a single atomic transaction, they manipulated the share price using a flash loan and stole assets worth approximately $6.04 million. Of this amount, the LowerRisk USDC vault suffered losses of approximately $5.64 million, while the HigherRisk USDC vault suffered losses of approximately $0.4 million. The report said the issue was not a contract code vulnerability or a private key leak, but rather the injection of overvalued assets into the Ark strategy, which was no longer in use but was still counted in the NAV, causing the vault share price to be artificially inflated and completing the arbitrage. After the incident, the protocol paused all Vaults and set the deposit limit to zero, and the team is working with

PlanB_Follower 2026-07-07

Inflation expectations are rising again, putting the Fed under tremendous pressure.

Original content no longer visible

PlanB_Follower 2026-07-03

Once the war machine is set in motion, civilians always pay the highest price, and any talk of decentralization within the crypto community rings hollow.

Original content no longer visible

PlanB_Follower 2026-07-02

In the group chat, they’re already guessing how many projects will *pull out* after this upgrade. Honestly, what I’m more curious about are those old NFT collections that didn’t leave—once the floor price drops through and the royalty switch is turned off, the community chat basically goes from “consensus” to “ruins.”
I’ve seen a PFP project on a niche chain. The team bailed long ago, but a few holders are still hanging out in Discord, doing their own curation and setting up an auction pool. Liquidity? Almost none. But that kind of laid-back feeling of “whatever—no one’s managing it anymore” i

PlanB_Follower 2026-06-30

Every coffee counts. I stuck this rule on the refrigerator, after all, those 'just a few dollars' excuses add up to enough to buy ETH📝

Original content no longer visible

ETH-1.87%

PlanB_Follower 2026-06-29

The Singapore court's ruling this time was quite detailed, calculating compensation based on holding amounts and time, setting a precedent for algorithmic stablecoin collapses—the founder can't escape, but whether all the money can be recovered, I think it's doubtful.

WuSaidBlockchainW2026-06-29 10:34:50

The Singapore International Commercial Court has ruled that Terraform Labs and its founder Do Kwon must compensate 40 investors of TerraUSD (UST) with over $3 million. The ruling is part of the second phase of the fraud lawsuit related to the collapse of TerraUSD, involving some of the 275 claimants. The compensation amount is determined based on the amount of UST held and the holding period. (Bloomberg)

PlanB_Follower 2026-06-28

Community hot money surged in with $630k, pushing volume to $3.9 million. Short-term sentiment is overheated; position management is more important than FOMO.

Tm_Crypto2026-06-28 04:57:45

$ACT surged 16.8% in just 3 hours!
Strong community momentum and over $630K in net inflows fueled a sharp breakout, pushing trading volume to 3.9M USDT. 📈
⚠️ However, caution is warranted RSI above 93 signals extremely overbought conditions, while negative funding rates suggest growing short positions.
Momentum is strong, but risk management is essential.
$ACT ‌#BTCProbes60KKeySupportLevel #USNetCapitalInflowsHitRecord884B #STRCHitsAllTimeLow

PlanB_Follower

Trending Topics

#GateRanks2ndIn30DayNetInflows

#GateIdleFundsSurpass$300M

#TeslaQ3EarningsPreview

#GateSeptemberTransparencyReport

#StriveHoldingsRiseTo36818BTC

#MicronHostsTechnicalWebinar

#UnitreeTechSurges18%

#SpaceXQ3Earnings

#BlockchainAssociationBacksGENIUSAct

#GateSquareNewCreatorProgram