Recently, I saw a bunch of people talking about LST/re-staking, constantly mentioning "an extra layer of yield," and I just want to laugh: returns aren't just growing out of thin air, essentially it's just splitting the same safety/security/liquidity into multiple sales, with fees, subsidies, and the market expectations of latecomers all added together. The small gains you see as stable are actually just risk being packaged differently.



The risks are pretty straightforward: the underlying staking already has penalties/unbonding periods, re-staking is like tying more ropes, whether it's contracts, operations, or governance—if any link breaks, you're in trouble. I’m not surprised by recent cross-chain bridge hacks; what I fear most is the "combination attack": bridges, oracles, liquidations all hitting at once, and everyone tacitly waiting for "confirmation"... On-chain, emotions don't matter; slippage is what counts. Anyway, whenever I see a yield curve that’s too smooth, I just assume it’s lying to me so I can go back to sleep.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned