Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
Today I spent the whole day on Codex automation.
My biggest impression:
The most valuable part of the agent is not
automatically doing everything for you.
But continuously pushing a bunch of stuck in-progress tasks
to the next clear checkpoint.
Today it did several types of tasks:
1. For those that can write code, directly fix in a clean worktree.
For example, a bug caused by misjudgment in a wiki compiler,
fix it in a clean worktree first,
after verification,
then cherry-pick back to the main repository with my approval.
2. For those that can be verified, directly refresh evidence.
For example, strategy preflight, watch artifacts, dashboard,
it will re-verify old blockers,
then write back to the current gate.
3. For decisions that require my approval, generate a decision card.
For example, whether to submit KYC,
whether to publicly follow up on affiliate issues,
whether to clear a dirty repo window.
This is very critical.
A good agent workflow,
the core is not “full automation.”
The core is:
it continuously advances low-risk tasks;
it stops for high-risk ones,
compressing decisions into a single sentence I can approve or reject.
Today I also hit a few pitfalls:
Dirty worktrees can block integration;
long logs can consume all context;
repeatedly refreshing old blockers wastes tokens;
stale locks can be left if the runner exits uncleanly.
So I finally changed it into two layers:
Resident layer:
lightweight scan every 15 minutes,
only look at new artifacts, locks, decision queues, task timestamps.
Deep push layer:
only when a real trigger occurs,
select a task to push to commit, report, parser, decision card, or waiting sample.
Running this setup,
feels more like a junior PM + engineer.
It doesn’t replace my product judgment,
but it continuously clears backlog,
turns fuzzy issues into clear evidence,
turns implicit bottlenecks into explicit decisions.
I’m increasingly convinced now:
the core ability of future personal workflows,
is not “whether you can code with AI.”
But whether you can design your task system,
in a way that an agent can continuously push forward.