I'm now checking if the project is actually working on something. The first thing I look at isn't how much the PPT costs, but how the treasury funds are being spent: whether each expense matches the milestones, paying for A after completing A, and not rushing if it's not done yet. That kind of "max out the budget first, then fill in the progress later," honestly, is like someone putting the bill in my name at a drinking party, and everyone pretending to forget later...

Recently, cross-chain bridges have had issues again, and oracle price feeds are acting up. Many people in the group are starting to repeat "wait for confirmation," which feels quite real: when risks appear, everyone wants to stay safe first. The treasury should learn to "wait for confirmation" too—code, audits, mainnet data, user feedback, at least have one solid piece before asking for money. Otherwise, I might be late for governance meetings, but I really don't want to be the one footing the bill this time.