Korean lawmakers call for prioritizing stablecoin legislation to prevent equity restriction disputes from delaying the process

robot
Abstract generation in progress
ME News, On April 17 (UTC+8), Kim Sang-hoon, Chairman of the Digital Asset Special Committee of the People Power Party of South Korea, said at an academic conference that he is concerned about restrictions on equity in cryptocurrency exchanges, and called for prioritizing the development of the stablecoin-related digital asset basic law (second-phase legislation) to avoid missing the golden window for legislation due to equity regulation disputes. He noted that abroad, the issuance and circulation of the Korean won stablecoin KRWQ has already become a reality, posing a severe challenge to monetary sovereignty. Kim Sang-hoon emphasized that the law should give markets predictability, provide clear guidance for operators, and offer effective safety mechanisms for users. (Source: ODAILY)
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 11
  • 6
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
GateUser-ffe7bee5
· 4h ago
Clear guidelines mean regulations should be straightforward; avoid creating ambiguous areas.
View OriginalReply0
DaoDoorKeeper
· 10h ago
Legislative efficiency and market confidence are intertwined; prolonging the process harms both sides.
View OriginalReply0
EchoOfL2
· 12h ago
I hope that this time we can truly establish a system that balances innovation and security.
View OriginalReply0
HotAirBalloonViewing
· 12h ago
Let's push forward with the second phase of legislation quickly; the market can't wait.
View OriginalReply0
RetroRadioIridescence
· 12h ago
User security mechanisms must keep up; we can't just talk about innovation without considering risks.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-c1cab702
· 12h ago
Is KRWQ already circulating overseas? This indeed poses a potential threat to the sovereignty of the Korean won.
View OriginalReply0
InstantNoodle-LevelResearcher
· 13h ago
Overseas stablecoins are forcing domestic legislation, this plot feels familiar.
View OriginalReply0
MintCondition
· 13h ago
The term "golden legislative period" is very vivid; the window of opportunity is indeed limited.
View OriginalReply0
ForkInTheRoadmap
· 13h ago
Predictability is too important, and now practitioners don't know where the red line is.
View OriginalReply0
Stop-LossIsLikeAConfession
· 13h ago
Why must exchange equity restrictions and stablecoin legislation be in opposition when they are not mutually exclusive?
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pinned