Recently, I saw everyone complaining again about miners/validators eating MEV and unfair ordering.

Basically, when you confirm on the chain, someone might already be in line to "cut in front of you"...
So now I’m more persistent about "using the level of key management that matches the asset size."

For small amounts of money (the kind that wouldn’t keep you awake if lost), I just use hardware wallets plus separate backup mnemonics, which is enough;
When the funds grow larger, even with single signatures, safety fears of slips or phishing remain, so multi-signature is more reassuring—at least it won’t send you off the chain with one signature.
For social recovery, I think it’s suitable for those who are too lazy to keep paper backups but are willing to trust a few people.
The problem is, “friends” are harder to verify than contract permissions...

A couple of days ago, I looked at a pool.
LP tokens are locked, but there’s a switch in permissions to change the fee rate.
The team wallet is still testing small transactions on the routing contract (like 0.02 ETH),
I’d rather sign multiple times and press twice than become a tuition fee contributor.
Anyway, the bigger the assets, the less you should try to cut corners.