Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
I just learned about a rather complex situation in Arbitrum DAO, which appears to be a direct conflict between two groups of victims.
Basically, a major hack happened a month ago—about 30,765 ETH were stolen due to a vulnerability in Kelp DAO. The Arbitrum Security Council froze those funds, and now the DAO plans to return them to rsETH depositors. But then an attorney representing victims of North Korean terrorism appeared and filed a notice under New York State laws, demanding that the withdrawal of funds be blocked.
Why? Because U.S. authorities linked the Lazarus group, which carried out the hack, to North Korea. So, by the attorney’s logic, these ETH are North Korean property that could be used to satisfy court judgments. And there are quite a few such judgments—totaling around $877 million. They are tied to the 1972 Lod Airport massacre, the 2000 kidnapping of an American priest, and the 2006 war, in which Pyongyang allegedly armed Hezbollah.
So you end up with a dilemma. On one hand, there are people who lost their funds in DeFi and are waiting for them to be returned. On the other hand, families have been waiting 20-30 years for at least some compensation, and here they finally see a chance to recover something through the seized/frozen crypto assets.
Arbitrum delegates are divided. Some believe that ETH is stolen property and that it simply needs to be returned to rightful owners under the law. Others say this shifts North Korea’s debt burden onto innocent people. Plus, there’s the issue of daily losses for Aave users, whose positions are locked.
The legal mechanism here is CPLR §5222(b) under New York law, which allows assets to be frozen without a prior court order. Ignoring this could lead to being charged with contempt of court.
The complication is that Arbitrum DAO is not a company with a clear legal status, so the risk of liability could fall on specific individuals whom the court determines to be controlling the funds.
Overall, it’s an interesting story about how blockchain and traditional law collide in the most unexpected situations. The CoinDesk 100 index fell 1.5% yesterday, so the overall market sentiment isn’t very positive. Bitcoin is trading around 81,000, mainly due to tensions in Iran and movements in the stock markets.