My biggest enemy in multi-chain wallets isn’t hackers—it’s “fragmentation that throws people into confusion”… I only keep long-term positions in the main wallet. The other small, scattered assets on different chains are treated as a “spare change” wallet. I set a fixed upper limit for the amount; if it exceeds that limit, I immediately consolidate it back. Otherwise, if I don’t check for a week, I’ll forget exactly which chain still has a bit of small assets on it. Every time I move across chains, I make a quick note: from where to where, what I’m doing, and when I expect to bring it back—anyway, don’t count on your memory.



In the past couple of days, before and after that mainstream public chain’s upgrade/maintenance, people in the group have been speculating whether projects will migrate. I’ve already gone through the relevant chains’ authorizations and old addresses first. Some allowances are really outrageous… You ask, “Wouldn’t it be more convenient to put everything in one wallet?” Convenience is convenience, but I’d rather be a bit more troublesome and separate the risk boundaries—so I can sleep more soundly.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned