I see the King of the Dragon as follows


This is purely moral coercion, isn't it?
The main difference between calling on chain memes and secondary market is
Playing secondary contracts profits and losses are lost to the exchange, so
BTC and ETH's rise and fall don't matter
Playing on-chain memes is direct PVP, and those who lose money hate those who make money too much
If you lose money, you criticize those who make money; if you call out signals first, you're at fault
Actually, no matter what you play, those who lose money definitely outnumber those who make money, it's a zero-sum game, and after deducting some fees, it becomes a negative-sum game
We should actually thank those who dare to call signals, otherwise how can information spread quickly?
But whether to buy or participate, isn't the decision right in your own hands?
Trading is just the realization of cognition, whether you can enter depends on your own judgment,
Those who make money keep a low profile, while those who lose money start to demand rights,
If this continues, how can anyone contribute to future development?
This matter is quite interesting, I think it's worth discussing, what does everyone think?
BTC0.44%
ETH1.37%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin