Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
#AaveSuesToUnfreeze73MInETH highlights a groundbreaking legal battle in May 2026 that tests the intersection of decentralized governance and traditional law. Aave LLC has filed an emergency motion in a New York federal court to vacate a restraining order that froze 30,766 ETH—roughly $73 million. These funds, originally stolen during the April 18 Kelp DAO exploit, were successfully intercepted and moved by the Arbitrum Security Council into a DAO-controlled wallet.
The legal tension arises from a claim by plaintiffs holding terrorism-related judgments against North Korea. They argue that because the Lazarus Group allegedly conducted the hack, the stolen ETH now constitutes North Korean property subject to seizure for debt collection. Aave’s founder, Stani Kulechov, counters this with a fundamental legal principle: "A thief does not own what he steals." Aave contends that the funds belong solely to the victims of the exploit. This case is pivotal, as it could decide whether "on-chain debt collection" can legally bypass victim restitution in decentralized protocols