Recently, I've been looking at those "coincidental transfers" on the blockchain, and I no longer really believe in coincidences. First, break down the path: from the exchange withdrawal to which new address, whether it passes through one or two layers of intermediaries, then which contract/pool it interacts with. Many times, it's the same group of people using different aliases to go through the process. To put it simply, following the route is more reliable than blindly guessing by focusing on a single point.

These days, Meme and celebrity shoutouts are heating up again. When attention shifts, newcomers are most easily misled by narratives like "just happened to transfer in and then get pulled out," and veteran players warning against taking the last step isn't just for show... I myself follow my plan; if the trigger conditions aren't right, I prefer to miss out.

What I fear most isn't slowness but chaos: slow can still be reviewed, but in chaos, people tend to get itchy hands and add positions recklessly, ultimately writing stop-losses in prayers. That's all for now.