Why do some countries pay special attention to language, literature, and art workers? Essentially, it's because these fields are not just "cultural expression"; they are also "channels for the dissemination of ideas." Language and literature are not only about storytelling and poetry; they can also shape how people understand the world: what is right, what is wrong, what is worth pursuing, and what should be questioned. When writers, poets, journalists, or artists in a society possess strong expressive abilities, they often can present real-world issues in more vivid and compelling ways, resonating with more people and even prompting reflection on the existing order. It is precisely because of this influence that some regimes are particularly sensitive to these groups. On one hand, they may worry about the uncontrolled spread of ideas affecting social stability or the established order; on the other hand, powerful expression can indeed steer public opinion and even lead to institutional changes. Therefore, throughout history, literary and artistic workers have sometimes been encouraged to develop and sometimes been restricted, with the key being that they hold "discourse power" and "narrative ability." From a more neutral perspective, this actually illustrates one point: whoever controls expression is more likely to influence cognition; and language itself is a soft social force.