Recently, there have been people on the blockchain saying, "This transfer is just too coincidental."


I now reflexively break down the path first: where the coins came from, whether there was a bridge, whether it went around in an aggregator before reaching the exchange,
many look like cryptic codes, but they are actually just routing/fees/time differences layered together.
The RWA (Real-World Asset) set is also quite funny; everyone compares the yields of U.S. Treasury bonds to on-chain yield products,
but honestly, the sources of risk are completely different—most on-chain issues are about "which link in the path might fail."
A colleague just asked me if I discovered some insider info again, and I can only say don’t overthink it.
My biggest fear is overthinking and then emotionally trading…
Anyway, when I see coincidences now, I treat them as engineering problems—if they can be explained, they’re not mysterious;
if they can’t be explained, I stay away for now.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin