Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
The US CFTC insists that sports betting falls under the financial category and seeks to prevent enforcement actions in Arizona.
ME News Report, April 9 (UTC+8), in court documents filed on the evening of April 8, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Department of Justice requested that the federal court prevent the state of Arizona from enforcing its gambling laws against prediction market operator Kalshi. The regulatory agencies believe that contracts based on real-world events such as sports and elections are financial derivatives called “swaps” and should be regulated by federal authorities rather than state-level gambling laws. Arizona has filed criminal charges against Kalshi, arguing that sports event outcome contracts are no different from traditional bets and should be regulated as gambling. A federal court in New Jersey recently issued a ruling favorable to Kalshi, determining that its sports contracts are generally permitted under federal law, but courts in other jurisdictions tend to support the state’s position. The outcome of this case will determine whether prediction markets operate nationwide under a unified federal framework or are subject to varying state gambling regulations. (Source: PANews)