WLFI strikes back: This is not passive defense, but a direct confrontation!

If you think this is a one-sided attack, then you underestimate WLFI.
From the current information, the other party has not chosen silence but has responded directly.
What does this indicate?
It shows that both sides have confidence.
Legally, it's hard to determine who has the advantage from an external perspective.
But in the market, attitude itself is a signal.
WLFI's strategy is clear:
Not to let the narrative be completely controlled by the other side.
Because in the crypto world, public opinion is part of value.
If you lose a lawsuit but gain market trust, it may not be a loss.
The reverse is also true.
So this confrontation is actually a "dual battlefield":
* Victory or defeat in court
* Narrative control in the market
Who can win largely depends on—who is better at storytelling.#gate廣場五月交易分享