Recently, during a meeting, someone was arguing that "modularization" is like arguing over splitting the bill at a dinner table... Basically, for end users, the most direct changes are twofold: more chains in the wallet, and operations that feel more like "choosing a route." Before, it was just one path—whether to block or not; now, settlement, data, and execution are separated, and transfers or transactions might go around in circles, waiting for confirmation, which depends on bridges, sorting, and whether they've been queued with other tasks.



Then, during the airdrop season, this becomes even more obvious: task platforms shout about anti-witch-hunting on one hand, while implementing a points system on the other, turning yield farmers into clock-in workers. Modularization pushes the small choices of "which chain to do the task on, which bridge to use, how much balance to leave for payment" onto you. The returns aren't guaranteed, but the steps are more detailed... Anyway, I only have one rule now: avoid jumping chains as much as possible. No matter how lively the wallet review session gets, I don't want to revisit the transaction history.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin