Pendiri Solana Peringatkan AI Bisa Membongkar Skema Kriptografi Pasca-Quantum

Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko said that artificial intelligence (AI) is the biggest imminent threat to cryptography for crypto assets. He said AI could break post-quantum cryptography (PQC) signature schemes before the industry strengthens its security.

Bitcoin developers and analysts are now starting to agree on the future quantum threat without disrupting Satoshi Nakamoto’s ownership.

Yakovenko Pushes Multisig Defense for Post-Quantum Cryptography

The Solana co-founder believes the industry has not fully understood the mathematical weaknesses and implementation of PQC.

He wants wallets to combine multiple signature schemes with a two-of-three multisig system. This setup can be supported natively in Solana’s transaction processor through Program Derived Addresses.

“In my opinion, the biggest risk is that the PCQ signature scheme will be broken by AI. We don’t even know all the traps on the implementation side, let alone the mathematics,” Yakovenko said.

The founder of Curve Finance, Michael Egorov, had once asked whether formal verification could cover the gap. However, according to Yakovenko, verification only helps if developers already know exactly what needs to be verified.

He still prefers redundancy from two of the three mutually independent schemes.

Bitcoiner Reaches Early Consensus on Satoshi’s Coins

Alex Thorn, head of research at Galaxy Digital, said that an agreement is beginning to form about Satoshi’s ownership. He cites several discussions taking place this week in Las Vegas with skeptics, supporters, and other Bitcoiner.

Estimated 1.1 million Bitcoin
BTCUSD
owned by Satoshi are spread across around 22,000 P2PK addresses, each containing 50 BTC. Thorn revealed that a long-range attack must break into each address one by one. Meanwhile, exchanges can migrate to post-quantum addresses before Q-day arrives.

He added that the Bitcoin market can typically absorb selling pressure of more than one million BTC. This shows the network can still hold up in the worst-case scenario without sacrificing the network’s core property rights.🎯🔥 Supra Dilemma of Structuring Futures Signals 🔥🎯
The market is in an less-than-ideal condition…

not that it can’t be read, but it’s uncomfortable to execute ⚖️

⚔️ Two Options That Are Both “Uncomfortable”

🔴 SHORT?

📉 Price is already high

💡 Logically “it should go down”

But…

🚫 Momentum is still strong

🚫 No valid reversal signal yet

👉 Short = swimming against the current 🌊❌

🟢 LONG?

📈 Momentum is still rising

🔥 The trend is still strong

But…

⚠️ BTC is already at 80.000

⚠️ ETH is already at 2.400

👉 Long = chasing the price 🏃‍♂️❌

🧠 Supra’s Decision

❌ Not short

❌ Not long

✅ ABSTAIN

🎯 Why Abstain?

📊 There is no ideal entry

⚖️ Risk ≈ Reward (not balanced)

🧩 The structure hasn’t given an edge yet

👉 This isn’t about direction…

👉 It’s about timing that isn’t right yet

⚡ If You Still Want to Enter?

👉 🟢 LONG > SHORT (safer)

Why?

✔️ In line with momentum

✔️ Not fighting the trend

✔️ Risk is more controllable

🔥 Supra’s Closing

Trading isn’t about always entering…

it’s about entering at the right time 🎯

To be patient and wait…

usually the one who gets the best position 😈