Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
Open-source weight encoding agent compared to Claude Code training domain model
AIMPACT News, May 4th (UTC+8), Hugging Face released a comparative experiment evaluating the performance of open-source weight-encoded intelligent agents (Pi + Moonshot AI Kimi K2.6) versus Claude Code + Opus 4.7 on training domain-specific models. The task was to classify Jim Crow laws in the congressional records of North Carolina from 1866 to 1967. The experiment used the same single-line prompt, taking approximately 13 minutes end-to-end, and the results have been uploaded to Hugging Face. The article did not mention specific performance metrics or conclusions. (Source: InFoQ)