Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
South Korea's cryptocurrency industry collectively opposes the new anti-money laundering regulations, which propose that all overseas transfers exceeding 10 million won be reported as suspicious transactions.
ME News Report, May 4th (UTC+8), South Korea’s DAXA organization representing 27 registered virtual asset service providers (VASPs) expressed opposition to the proposed amendments to the “Specific Financial Information Act” by the Korea Financial Services Commission (FSC) and the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU). The new regulation requires that when domestic VASPs transfer virtual assets to overseas VASPs, transactions of 10 million Korean won (approximately $6,800) or more, regardless of risk level, must be reported as suspicious transaction reports (STR). DAXA warned that this could increase the annual reporting volume of South Korea’s five major trading platforms from about 63k to over 5.4 million, making compliance nearly impossible. The industry also opposes the proposed requirement to verify the accuracy of customer information, arguing that it imposes undefined legal obligations. Currently, this opposition comes amid a legal standoff with financial regulators. The public consultation period ends as the final decision on the new regulation is expected in July, highlighting the tension between increased regulation and industry burden. (Source: MLion)